A Capehart Scatchard Blog

Compensability

Owner Of Restaurant Who Left Home Earlier Than Usual For Meeting Was Not Covered In Accident On Way To Work

By on October 25, 2011 in Compensability with 0 Comments

Since the legislative change in 1979 to substitute a premises rule for the going-and-coming rule, there have been many attempts to expand the “special mission” exception.  The general rule is that only injuries on employer-owned or maintained premises are covered.  One big exception involves injuries that emanate from the performance of special missions.  That latest […]

Continue Reading »

Employer Did Not Owe Temp Benefits To Employee Fired For Violation Of Company Drug Policy

By on October 19, 2011 in Compensability with 0 Comments

John Gioia worked for Herr Foods as a delivery person.  He injured his right ankle stepping from his delivery truck on November 23, 2007.   He began authorized treatment right away and underwent an MRI one month later which revealed an avulsion fracture and sprain of the deltoid ligaments. The accident occurred on the Friday after […]

Continue Reading »

Light Duty – Harbatuk v. S&S Furniture Systems Insulation

By on July 7, 2011 in Compensability with 0 Comments

In addition to terminating temporary disability benefits on maximal medical improvement, an employer can terminate such benefits when the employee can return to work light or modified duty under Harbatuk v. S & S Furniture Systems Insulation, 211 N.J. Super. 614 (App. Div. 1986). The basic rule which emerges from Harbatuk is this:  the employer has […]

Continue Reading »

Intentional Harm – Millison v. E.I. duPont deNemours & Co.

By on July 7, 2011 in Compensability with 0 Comments

In New Jersey it is very difficult to get past the exclusive remedy provision.  The leading case on proving an intentional harm claim sufficient to get beyond the exclusive remedy is Millison v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., 101 N.J. 161 (1985) in which plaintiffs had shown intentional wrong by respondent in deliberately concealing […]

Continue Reading »

Intentional Harm – Laidlow v. Hariton Machinery Co., Inc.

By on July 7, 2008 in Compensability with 0 Comments

Until 2002, the standard employed to decide whether conduct constituted intentional harm was so rigid that it basically amounted to proving that an employer created a virtual certainty of harm. Then came a series of decisions from the New Jersey Supreme Court which opened up the exclusive remedy provision. One of the leading cases is Laidlow […]

Continue Reading »

Top