A Capehart Scatchard Blog

Site Map

Site Feeds

Pages

Monthly Archives

Categories

Top 20 Tags

All Articles

Occupational Stress – Stroka v. United Airlines

| July 7, 2008 | 0 Comments

When an employee’s worrying is not based on events which actually took place involving the employee but only on what

Occupational Stress – Goyden v. State Judiciary

| July 7, 2008 | 0 Comments

The most important occupational stress psychiatric opinion is Goyden v. State Judiciary, 256 N.J. Super. 438 (App. Div. 1991), aff’d, 128

Liens and Subrogation – Kuhnel v. CNA Ins. Cos.

| July 7, 2008 | 0 Comments

In Kuhnel v. CNA Ins. Cos., 322 N.J. Super. 568 (App. Div. 1999), certif. denied, 163 N.J. 12, cert. denied,

Liens and Subrogation – Errickson v. Supermarkets General Corp.

| July 7, 2008 | 0 Comments

New Jersey has a powerful subrogation provision under N.J.S.A. 34:15-40.  Respondent is entitled to two thirds of its payment if

Intentional Harm – Laidlow v. Hariton Machinery Co., Inc.

| July 7, 2008 | 0 Comments

Until 2002, the standard employed to decide whether conduct constituted intentional harm was so rigid that it basically amounted to

Independent Contractor – Re/Max v. Wausau Ins. Cos.

| July 7, 2008 | 0 Comments

The independent contractor test was thoroughly analyzed by the Supreme Court in Re/Max v. Wausau Ins. Cos., 162 N.J. 282 (2000).

Independent Contractor – Kertesz v. Korsh

| July 7, 2008 | 0 Comments

To establish that an employee is an independent contractor the employer must consider the two tests used in New Jersey. The

Fraud case – Cardiello v. Community Medical Center

| July 1, 2008 | 0 Comments

In a case handled successfully on appeal by Anne Hammill, Esq. of Capehart Scatchard,  the Appellate Division vacated a 60%

Fraud case – Singh v. Cream-O-Land Dairy

| July 1, 2008 | 0 Comments

New Jersey has its own fraud provision built into the statute under N.J.S.A. 34:15-57.4.  There are two helpful unreported cases

Casual employment – Martin v. Pollard

| July 1, 2008 | 1 Comment

Casual employees are excluded from receiving benefits under N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. The present definition of casual employment embraces two concepts, depending

Top