A Capehart Scatchard Blog

New Jersey Supreme Court Rules That Injured Employee May Not Sue Workers’ Comp Carrier for Pain and Suffering Caused Allegedly by Carrier’s Delay in Paying for Medical Services

By on August 6, 2012 in Uncategorized with 0 Comments

On August 1, 2012, the New Jersey Supreme Court weighed in on an issue that has important implications for all practitioners of workers’ compensation in this state.  The decision in Stancil v. ACE USA A-112-10, 06764 concerned a civil law suit stemming from the handling of a compensable work accident that occurred on May 14, 1995. Wade Stancil was injured in 1995 working for Orient Originals and received an award of total and permanent disability.

On September 12, 2007, the Judge of Compensation ordered ACE USA to pay certain outstanding bills consisting of treatment, prescriptions and transportation services.  The Judge of Compensation awarded counsel fees and warned the carrier against further violations of court orders.  At an October 29, 2007 hearing, the claimant alleged that the carrier ignored the court order and that the medical bills were still unpaid.  In that hearing, the Judge of Compensation found that the carrier’s actions were willful and intentional and awarded further counsel fees.  In 2008, petitioner underwent further surgery and psychiatric treatment.  His physician opined that the need for additional treatment was due to the delay of the carrier in making payments to medical providers.

The Judge of Compensation ultimately concluded that he lacked contempt powers and awarded counsel for petitioner a $1,500 fee.  He directed counsel to proceed in the Superior Court for further relief.  The claimant then filed a Superior Court action.  Defendant argued successfully that plaintiff was barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Act from proceeding in a civil suit against the carrier.  The New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed for three principal reasons:

1) First, the Court stated that workers’ compensation remains the exclusive remedy under the statute;

2) Second, the Court said that in amending the workers’ compensation act in 2008, the Legislature rejected a provision that would have given claimants greater power to file in Superior Court and instead adopted a remedy that permits the Judge of Compensation to act through its contempt powers;

3) Finally, the Court said that to allow a common law suit would be to make such actions the preferred manner of securing relief.

The Court said that a decision to allow such law suits “would subject all carriers to the threat of a direct right of action at law that would so overshadow our system of workers’ compensation that the Legislature’s will would be thwarted.” The Supreme Court observed that changes have been made to the New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Act under N.J.S.A. 34:15-28.2. That section of the law was specifically amended to address situations where carriers refuse to obey orders of Judges of Compensation.  The Court noted that an earlier version of the bill that led to these amendments would have given a Judge of Compensation broader permission to authorize an action in the Superior Court; however, that version was deleted from the final bill.

The decision in Stancil should put an end to civil law suits against carriers in New Jersey for damages from the manner in which a workers’ compensation claim has been handled.

Share

About the Author

About the Author:

John H. Geaney, a shareholder and co-chair of Capehart Scatchard's Workers' Compensation department, began an email newsletter entitled Currents in Workers’ Compensation, ADA and FMLA in 2001 in order to keep clients and readers informed on leading developments in these three areas of law. Since that time he has written over 500 newsletter updates.

Mr. Geaney is the author of Geaney’s New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Manual for Practitioners, Adjusters & Employers. The manual is distributed by the New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education (NJICLE). He also authored an ADA and FMLA manual as distributed by NJICLE. If you are interested in purchasing the manual, please contact NJICLE at 732-214-8500 or visit their website at www.njicle.com.

Mr. Geaney represents employers in the defense of workers’ compensation, ADA and FMLA matters. He is a Fellow of the College of Workers’ Compensation Lawyers of the American Bar Association and is certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a workers’ compensation law attorney. He is one of two firm representatives to the National Workers’ Compensation Defense Network. He has served on the Executive Committee of Capehart Scatchard for over ten (10) years.

A graduate of Holy Cross College summa cum laude, Mr. Geaney obtained his law degree from Boston College Law School. He has been named a “Super Lawyer” by his peers and Law and Politics. He serves as Vice President of the Friends of MEND, the fundraising arm of a local charitable organization devoted to promoting affordable housing.

Capehart Scatchard is a full service law firm with offices in Mt. Laurel and Trenton, New Jersey. The firm represents employers and businesses in a wide variety of areas, including workers’ compensation, civil litigation, labor, environmental, business, estates and governmental affairs.

.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Top